Jim Risch
Republican · Incumbent · U.S. Senate (ID) · 2026
Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and three-term incumbent U.S. Senator from Idaho.
Before politics: Senior Partner/Attorney, Risch, Goss, Insinger, and Gustavel Former Professor of Law, Boise State University, 1972-1975 Former Prosecuting Attorney, Ada County, 1970-1974
Their shot at this seat
Jim Risch is highly likely to hold this seat because the overwhelming structural advantage of the electorate, combined with his fundraising lead, provides a massive cushion against any electoral volatility.
Who's behind them
Jim Risch retains a commanding financial advantage and key establishment support, signaling that his core electoral coalition remains firmly intact.
What could go wrong
The incumbent’s minor history of campaign finance issues is the only tangible vulnerability, yet his consistent electoral success suggests these past infractions are unlikely to impede him.
Why they fit this seat
Jim Risch’s record aligns closely with the conservative priorities of his constituency, ensuring his legislative focus remains highly relevant to the current electorate.
Key contrasts
Advocates for spending restraint and balanced budgets.
advocates for fair competition and middle-class economic relief
Who this moves: Fiscal conservatives concerned about national debt and government spending.
1 of 6
| Issue | Jim Risch | Todd Achilles | Who this moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economy and taxes | Opposes Advocates for spending restraint and balanced budgets. | Supports advocates for fair competition and middle-class economic relief | Fiscal conservatives concerned about national debt and government spending. |
| Healthcare | Opposes Advocates for private-sector healthcare; opposes government-owned entities. | Supports advocates for reforming ACA and strengthening public options | Voters concerned with healthcare access and affordability. |
| Abortion and social issues | Supports Consistent, vocal anti-abortion supporter; A+ rating from SBA. | Supports supports reproductive access and Idaho's abortion ballot initiative | Socially conservative voters who prioritize the anti-abortion movement. |
| Democracy and elections | Avoids Avoids public town halls; relies on party-insider strategy. | Supports advocates for independent, reform-focused, and anti-corruption leadership | Voters seeking direct accountability and transparency from their representative. |
| Immigration and border | Supports Supports border wall; opposes path to citizenship. | Supports supports border security and legal pathways to citizenship | Voters prioritizing border security as a top national threat. |
| Foreign policy and defense | Supports Balances 'America First' with assertive global leadership. | Opposes advocates for ending endless wars and reasserting war powers | Voters concerned with U.S. global engagement and military oversight. |
Who has more standing to be believed
| Credibility axis | Jim Risch | Todd Achilles |
|---|---|---|
Insider knowledge | Three-term U.S. Senator; serves on Foreign Relations and Ethics Committees. | State legislative experience only. |
Moral legitimacy | Endorsed by party organization and Donald Trump; no rival decline or censure on record. | Same-party rival David Roth withdrew; no party endorsement on record. |
Scandal resilience | One confirmed formal event: a settled FEC fine for campaign finance violations. | One documented allegation or informal complaint, no formal finding resulted. |
Pressure absorption | Won most recent general election and primary; no recall or censure on record. | Won a contested primary for state office in 2024. |
Three-term U.S. Senator; serves on Foreign Relations and Ethics Committees.
State legislative experience only.
1 of 4
Network
Endorsements and money spent against
National endorsements
- Donald Trump
Signals against
No information — no opposition-only outside-spend committees recorded — absence of data, not absence of oppositionThe case they'd make
Senator Risch appeals to a stable coalition of fiscal and social conservatives who prioritize border security and strong national defense. His long-standing focus on foreign policy and military oversight continues to resonate with voters seeking experienced leadership in Washington. His candidacy represents the interests of those concerned with government spending and the long-term direction of the country.